Information Management from the Interpretation of Al-Quran: Study on Tafsir Nur Al-Ihsan

Abstract

The development of work in field of Quranic interpretation has grown rapidly in this age. The work in this field has been written in various major languages of the world such as Arabic, English and Malay. The resulting works, contain a lot of information quoted from the works written by previous authors. For example, the work of Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan written by Muhammad Said Omar contains a lot of information quoted from Tafsir al-Jalalyn, Tafsir al-Baydawi and Tafsir al-Jamal. Nevertheless, this study found that the information being referred to by him. Therefore, a method or system should be practiced so that the information contained in the work of Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan can be managed well as well as avoid the mistakes of readers. On way to manage these resources is to identify the original work referred to by the author.The analysis of Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan used the genetic approach which was published by Goldman in studying the origin of the resources. This study referred the text from Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan and the text of works that became author's references, which are Tafsir al-Jalalyn, Tafsir al-Jamal, Tafsir al-Baydawi, Tafsir al-Khazin, Tafsir al-Baghawi, Tafsir al-Tabari, Tafsir al-Qurtubi, Tafsir al-Razi, Tafsir al- Nasafi, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Tafsir al Tha'labi, and made a comparison of the text to detect the similarities and differences. The result of the analysis proved that Syeikh Muhammad Sa'id implemented five methods; which are quoting the text in parallel, writing an abstract, removal of some of the words, adding explanation, and refuting part of the text. This study also revealed the purpose of Syeikh Mumamad Sa'id while creating his work is the strengthen the translations written. Thus, he successfully strengthens translation when the contents of the text are parallel to the reference. However, in certain places existed a text from the author's references contradicts with the content of Tafsir Nur al-Ihsan, which failed his attempt to strengthen the translation in certain part of the text.