Abstract:
In the era of the Internet, the Sunnah of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be
upon him, was subjected to many and various slanders; the enemies of Islam persisted
in undermining them and raising suspicions around them, sometimes by challenging
their argument, sometimes by contradicting them, and sometimes by opposing the Holy
Qur’an and reality.Among those who contested the problematic hadiths: the orientalists
and their followers, they raised in this time the contradictions of other prophets in the
past ages, which the prophets had contradicted, claiming that the Prophet commanded
his companions not to write the Sunnah, which led to the loss of the Sunnah and not its
codification in The first era of Islam, which prompted the modernists in the following
eras to put the hadiths from themselves or convey them from the People of the Book
and their attribution to the Prophet, as this led to their contradiction and opposition.
Among these hadiths are the hadiths of killing dogs and their acquisition. Orientalists
have claimed that there is a contradiction between these hadiths, as there are hadiths
ordering the killing and non-possession of dogs; other hadiths that allow them to be
acquired and not killed; and Orientalists claimed that Muslim scholars could not
reconcile these hadiths.These orientalists have followers who followed their path,
followed their trail, and published these suspicions, and they took from the internet
sites a platform for them to transmit these toxins, and among these sites are the atheistic
Arab sites that are skeptical of the Prophet’s Sunnah.Therefore, we will shed light on
this suspicion and what the plagues raised about it, we follow their sayings, while
responding to them and dropping their arguments, by presenting the sayings of the
trustworthy scholars who served the prophetic Sunnah
