<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/31325">
<title>Ahmad Rozelan Bin Yunus, Prof. Dr.</title>
<link>http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/31325</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/32119"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/31648"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T22:12:54Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/32119">
<title>Workforce Characteristics: Psychometric Profiling Strategy in IR 4.0 Era</title>
<link>http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/32119</link>
<description>Workforce Characteristics: Psychometric Profiling Strategy in IR 4.0 Era
Ahmad Rozelan Yunus; Wan Anor Wan Sulaiman; Sabri Mohammad Sharif; Yan Guspriadi
Industry 4.0 (IR 4.0) is the implementation of Cyber Physical Systems for production. Its impact in the manufacturing sector and other technology sectors are well documented. However, the impact to human resource sector is understudied. Managing the human capital of IR 4.0 is not an easy task since it requires continuous innovation and learning dependent on people and enterprise’s capabilities. Personality profiling strategy for appropriate worker screening approaches can play a vital role in the development of dynamics capabilities in Higher Learning Institution (HLI). This paper aims to present worker screening approach using systematic psychometrics profiling that promotes a climate of innovation and learning in organization, and hence facilitate businesses to match the pace of IR 4.0. The overview employs a personality profiling framework with 15 personality domains developed in an integrated and systematic tool named as i-PRO (Integrated Profiling System). The tool was developed for Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM). One of the major concepts applied was the application of Holland Individual-Environmental Congruency career interest, and adapting various established psychometrics profiling approaches, as an initiative towards adequate systematic screening strategy for recruitment, placement, succession plan, and planning the organizations’ personnel development training.
</description>
<dc:date>2023-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/31648">
<title>Family education : Instilling career expectations for woman</title>
<link>http://unisep.lib.unishams.edu.my/xmlui/handle/123456789/31648</link>
<description>Family education : Instilling career expectations for woman
Agung Tri Prasetia; Ahmad Rozelan Yunus; Herman Nirwana; Afdal Afdal; Yarmis Syukur; Mega Iswari; Miftahul Fikri
Because women in Indonesian society gain more experience in the family, one of which is education instilled through family gender culture, women's career aspirations are believed to have their own characteristics. In today's society, the current condition of female students' career expectations is apprehensive. Most of the female students do not have any professional characteristics, such as career aspirations. This research involving 109 female students from various cultural contexts will divide their findings into two categories: patriarchal family education and matriarchal family education. The main objective of this research is to investigate the career expectations of female students in relation to patriarchal and matriarchal family education, and to compare the two household categories. As a result, the majority of female students from societies that place a patriarchal emphasis on gender have expectations of career self-efficacy, whereas those from societies that place a matriarchal emphasis on gender have expectations of outcomes. Parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for comparative analysis. The test results show F = 75.011 for career expectations on self-efficacy and F = 145.467 for outcome expectation (OE). 0.000 is a significant value for both variations.
</description>
<dc:date>2024-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
